Home > General > 0x80092012


timeout was 2 seconds. The TLS connection request has failed. The TLS connection request has failed. When I said entirely I meant no check for any certificate in the chain not entirely as in system-wide.

I was taking a cue from how we disable revocation when peer verification is disabled. Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc. Already have an account? Bug: https://github.com/bagder/curl/issues/264 Reported-by: zenden2k ">SSL: Add an option to disable certificate revocation checks … New tool option --ssl-no-revoke. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/alejacma/2009/05/28/certenrollcx509enrollmentp_createrequest-returns-error-0x80092012/

Additional information: Error Constructing or Publishing Certificate When testing certutil -verify -urlfetch subca.cer The revocation function was unable to check revocation because the revocation server was offline. 0x80092013 (-2146885613 CRYPT_E_REVOCATION_OFFLINE) ------------------------------------ Reply Follow UsPopular TagsCryptoAPI System.Security Debugging WinDbg CertEnroll P/Invoke Windows 7 RSACryptoServiceProvider VBScript Windows SDK Windows Vista Windows Server 2008 Windows XP CAPICOM Smart Card ADSI Windows Server 2003 CryptAcquireContext CNG When I use the command on the subCA certificate, however, while the CDPs are verified, the AIAs return "No CRL".

Save time, search the archives at > http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html . > To unsubscribe, mailto:[email protected] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp > contains important info. System Error: Access is denied. . Server: UnKnown Address: 2001:4860:4860::8888 DNS request timed out. There doesn't seem to be any other indications of a problem either.

So, kudos for that I guess. :-) curl member jay commented Jun 18, 2015 I see two possibles, either we document the workaround (allow insecure connections) or add an option to The attached data contains the server certificate. Valid Root CA certificate on all distribution points"certutil -verify -urlfetch subca.cer" returns "No CRL" for each distribution point2. February 9th, 2010 4:42pm Yes; the CRL is accessible and valid at both CDPs.Also, notice that both the CDPs are "Verified" in the output while its returning "No CRL" when it

Error: (04/28/2016 11:46:20 PM) (Source: Service Control Manager) (User: ) Description: The Sync Host_b51f83d service terminated unexpectedly. Regards, Oleg Tuesday, October 13, 2015 1:33 PM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote Issue closed. DNS request timed out. MiniToolBox by Farbar Version: 07-02-2016 01 Ran by Dad (administrator) on 29-04-2016 at 18:03:50 Running from "C:\Users\Dad\Downloads" Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (X64) Model: System Product Name Manufacturer: System manufacturer Boot Mode:

I will note that Fiddler has been used by millions of Windows users for over a decade and this is the first time I'm aware of where a CRL-offline check has http://codeswamp.tolon.co.uk/codeswamp_80092012.html Revocation Status: The revocation function was unable to check revocation for the certificate. Ping... The error code is 0x80092012.

Thank you! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site. Click here to get your free copy of Network Administrator. Error: (04/26/2016 04:57:10 PM) (Source: Application Error) (User: ) Description: Faulting application name: MotoHelperAgent.exe, version:, time stamp: 0x56efd8c4 Faulting module name: MotoHelperAgent.exe, version:, time stamp: 0x56efd8c4 Exception code: 0xc0000409

Thanks for the confirmation of this, Carlos. I'm concerned that I don't really have a good measurement of "not much". We can check if we can properly download the CRL of a certificate with the following command: certutil -url certificate.cerA URL Retrieval Tool will appear for that certificate. jay self-assigned this May 13, 2015 jay referenced this issue May 13, 2015 Closed libcurl + winssl = https not working on Windows 2000 #253 jay added the SSL/TLS label May

Error: (04/26/2016 04:58:42 PM) (Source: Microsoft-Windows-CAPI2) (User: ) Description: Cryptographic Services failed while processing the OnIdentity() call in the System Writer Object. Does any one know if the purchased certs have the crl distribution points properly \ inserted in the certs? Maybe we need an option to enable the use of SCH_CRED_REVOCATION_CHECK_CHAIN_EXCLUDE_ROOT or SCH_CRED_REVOCATION_CHECK_END_CERT for specific use cases like this.

It took reissue SubCA.

To unsubscribe, mailto:[email protected] [prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] Configure | About | News | Addalist | SponsoredbyKoreLogic Skip to content Ignore Learn COM Date: 2001-08-21 21:40:19 [Download message RAW] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Excellent! Solution of Stop Error 0x80092012 To fix Stop error 0x80092012 and to repair damaged or corrupted Windows files you need to use 0x80092012 repair tool. Bug: #264 Reported-by: zenden2k 172b2be curl member jay commented Jul 17, 2015 I've added an option to disable revocation checking for WinSSL in 172b2be.

New value CURLSSLOPT_NO_REVOKE for CURLOPT_SSL_OPTIONS. Error: (04/26/2016 04:57:10 PM) (Source: Application Error)(User: ) Description: MotoHelperAgent.exe14.8.6.156efd8c4MotoHelperAgent.exe14.8.6.156efd8c4c00004090007b92f9801d1a016f0124188C:\Program Files (x86)\Motorola Mobility\Motorola Device Manager\MotoHelperAgent.exeC:\Program Files (x86)\Motorola Mobility\Motorola Device Manager\MotoHelperAgent.exe4c764b1f-84d1-4ee5-b30b-562b6ece9d78 Error: (04/26/2016 04:57:10 PM) (Source: Application Error)(User: ) Description: MotoHelperService.exe14.3.23.0552e6b41MSVCR120.dll12.0.21005.1524f7ce6c0000409000a76662f7c01d1a01757a9a2a6C:\Program New tool option --ssl-no-revoke. The following corrective action will be taken in 10000 milliseconds: Restart the service.

Started by Baggi , Apr 29 2016 07:04 PM Please log in to reply 2 replies to this topic #1 Baggi Baggi Members 87 posts OFFLINE Local time:02:45 AM Posted Now, to Jay's point "ignore offline servers which is kind of defeating the point if you ask me"-- that's partially true, and what led Chrome to remove revocation checks from Chrome. Thanks, Mike February 5th, 2010 11:23pm It indicates a problemThe -URL tool simply helps you determine if the AIA and CDP URLs can be retrieved (or a response from the OCSP The TLS connection request has failed.

Date: 2016-04-29 16:55:23.745 Description: Code Integrity determined that a process (\Device\HarddiskVolume2\Program Files\Windows Defender\MsMpEng.exe) attempted to load \Device\HarddiskVolume2\Program Files\Microsoft Silverlight\xapauthenticodesip.dll that did not meet the Custom 3 / Antimalware signing level According to the ssl-compared chart there are other backends that have automatic checking (NSS, wolfSSL and DarwinSSL) so we could possibly accommodate them at some later point. P9X79 LE Rev 1.xxHow the computer is connected (wireless or wired) WiredMake and model of Router I think I have a modem and Router combo? timeout was 2 seconds.

New value CURLSSLOPT_NO_REVOKE for CURLOPT_SSL_OPTIONS. The attached data contains the server certificate. Currently this option applies only to WinSSL where we have automatic certificate revocation checking by default. A case like this could easily cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.

I hope this helps. New value CURLSSLOPT_NO_REVOKE for CURLOPT_SSL_OPTIONS. New value CURLSSLOPT_NO_REVOKE for CURLOPT_SSL_OPTIONS. If we have ever helped you in the past, please consider helping us.

I haven't received any response from the Verisign people on \ this (yet) other than another form email and it has been a few days. Can you access the CRLs manually? Regards, Oleg Marked as answer by Oleg.Kovalenko Tuesday, October 13, 2015 2:29 PM Edited by Oleg.Kovalenko Tuesday, October 13, 2015 2:30 PM Tuesday, October 13, 2015 2:29 PM Reply | Quote phishing sites like "BankOfTheVVest.com") even while it's true that such an effort would fail in the presence of an active MITM.

The error code is 0x80092012. I'm loathe to change this default behavior, even if there is not much of a gain in safety from the extra check.